The dangers and complexities of modern world have mobile phone an absolute necessity for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, mobile phone seems to be an indispensable thing in our life. This multifunctional gadget is not only close with adults but also is popular with teenagers. Most people believe that it is necessary for children to bring this technological piece when they are living in a modern but insecure society. From my point of view, I partly agree with this opinion for various reasons as now will be discussed.
Firstly, it is undeniable that with mobile phone, parent can keep an eye on their children. They can know where their children via global positioning system (gps) localization. This function also will help parent to control school truancy. Secondly, with the increasing number of crimes such as kidnapping, rape and various situation may happen, it is good for children to have a cell phone. With a mobile phone, limitation of communication was broken and children will be contactable in any case emergency or authorities can locate their place.
Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages when parent allow their children to use cellphone. With a huge storage of entertainment such as games, music… children may not concentrate on lessons in the class or listening to teachers as they are attracted by playing or chatting with their friend. They can neglect to do homework, they have been given. As a result, there may be a downfall of the score at the school. Furthermore, allowing children to carry an expensive gadget might in fact cause danger for them. Muggers can pay attention to rich kid and take action when they have a suitable chance. Additionally, some parents are too subjective and confident of easy communication when their children keeping a cellphone, they give them too much freedom without reasonable consideration.
In conclusion, I admit the benefits of giving children mobile phone, but I don’t believe that is absolute necessity for them. We should consider carefully instead of over-reliance on ability of curbing the danger and complexities from a mobile phone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-03 | Vu Thi Hoang Ngan | 84 | view |
- In the future, it is expected that there will be higher proportion of older people in some countries. Is this positive or negative development? 89
- If countries are serious about solving traffic problem they should tax private car heavily To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 75
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- By punishing murderer with the death penalty society is also guilty of committing murder Therefore life in prison is better punishment for murderers To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1717791411 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96119532999 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585889570552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6813307529 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252048998581 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804153678483 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666561322082 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168802707863 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641249929549 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1717791411 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96119532999 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585889570552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6813307529 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252048998581 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804153678483 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666561322082 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168802707863 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641249929549 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.