With the development of online, there is no future for the radio.To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

With the development of online, there is no future for the radio.

To what extent do you agree?

There is an issue regarding the prospect of radio. Some Internet followers claim that radio will vanish lately due to the popularity of the web. This essay disagrees with their viewpoint.

Let us start with reasons why a few internet supporters state radio will disappear in the future due to the cyber. The first reason is that people can read the news and enjoy songs on the global network. Citizens can find either any news or piece of melody on the web, so it is unnecessary for them to turn on radio and to wait for news time between music breaks. Another reason is that radio stations also broadcast their programs digitally online. People do not have to abandon their favorite transmission channels, because they can listen to them online. Furthermore, radio pulses are unavailable in remote areas. Radio listeners commonly cannot enjoy radio in the countryside, since radio signals weaken through hills as well as mountains, but with the help of the satellite connection, they are always connected to the web.

However, some radio followers believe that radio will remain for a long time. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, radio is both free and widespread. In contrast to the web, radio listeners do not have to pay for the Internet to listen to the radio, because radio receivers, which are present in nearly every modern device, can accept pervasive radio waves. Secondly, radio programs generally come live. Most humans usually consider radio more interesting to listen to, thanks to its coverage of events as well as different entertaining programs in real time. Moreover, radio is relevant to a particular region. On the Internet, it is difficult for news seekers to encounter info about their region, but radio streams can supply them with it, owing to their focus on events in their hometown.

In conclusion, although several online promoters argue that the cyberspace can cause the death of radio, I think that radio will stay unaffected by the net, as long as it is unpaid and amusing.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-20 vmanpreet@outlook.com 67 view
2020-01-17 Sheetal Bataniya 67 view
2020-01-16 Srbkor19sandhu 56 view
2020-01-14 Humayan Kabir 89 view
2020-01-13 Alishba 61 view
Essays by user Tolik :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99706744868 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52175542756 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560117302053 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0707372634 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6842105263 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238903861944 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793165299869 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351552252107 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140039699659 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618835831061 0.056905535591 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.