The computers are widely used in education and some people think that teachers do not play an important role in the classroom. To what extent do you agree?
There is a controversial issue about the place of teachers in computerized education. Some computer scientists state that computers are capable to displace the primacy of teachers in schools. In this essay, I disagree with the their point of view.
Let us start with reasons why computer scientists argue that computers can take the role of teachers. The first reason is that computer programs are more flexible to changes in school curriculum. It usually takes teachers many weeks to alter their teaching methods, if the head department decides to modify school syllabus, but education software can do it in a minute. Another reason is that they are available to students online. In contrast to humans, who are mostly unapproachable after work, computer programs can both answer to any questions and give lectures again to students after classes. As a result, computers are more convenient for managers as well as students, who have neither attended a class or learned a material well.
However, some tutors believe that computers are unable to compete with teachers in classrooms. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, computers cannot find unique approaches to students with different perceptual abilities. Many students fail to understand what software teaches, since each student has different abilities in education, but human instructors can see this difference and find another method to convey information. Secondly, teachers need no connection to either the Internet or electricity power. Computers will not operate in isolated environments, such as rural areas, where electricity blackout happens frequently, and the web is not always accessible. Therefore, computers are incapable to replace teachers because of its physical imperfection.
In conclusion, even though some computer scientists advocate that computers can take the role of teachers in education, I think that they cannot fully substitute them even in the next century for the above mentioned reasons.
- More and more newspapers and news channels are using photographs to support their news and stories. Some people think that photographs are not a reliable source of news while others consider photographs to be irrefutableDiscuss both sides and give your op 89
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 73
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 78
- All over the world, societies are facing a growing problem with obesity. This problem affects both children and adults.What are the reasons for this rise in obesity? How could it be tackled? 61
- These days people work in more than one job and often change career several times during their life What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...schools. In this essay, I disagree with the their point of view. Let us start with rea...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53896103896 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89704282724 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9005238824 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.352941176 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182881308651 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557086467865 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480576289637 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116810781339 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142991800988 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.