The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally.
Nowadays more and more people are using English while travelling around the world. There is an opinion in society that this will cause English to dominate among the all languages. Using one global language would obviously make communication between countries easier, however this has also some negative effects.
The main positive effect of having one universal language is the it would enhance the understanding between countries. Hence, if all the people in the world speak the same language, it will be easier for them to share the information and ideas. More than that, using one language can result in economic growth. Thus, if nations speak the global language, they would have more opportunities for their trade and business.
Nevertheless, despite the advantages above, there are also some drawbacks of using one global language. Firstly, this will lead to the eventual disappearing of the other languages around the world. That means the loss of not only letters and grammar but also national cultures and literature. There are expressions and words in some languages that can not be translated to English literally. For example, northern Russian nations have about 50 words describing the word “snow” and it is impossible to transfer the mood and emotions of northern tails using only one words. Secondly, the mentioned consequence will lead to another negative point. If all national languages disappear there will be the universal culture. Therefore, people will not want to travel because nothing will be to explore. This will bankrupt economy of small countries and nations. More than that all the interpreters will get redundant and will lose their job.
In conclusion, benefits of using one language for all nations are overweighted by disadvantages because using different languages help to preserve cultural heritage and diversity for future generations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | kabcpc | 67 | view |
2019-10-12 | Salma Mohamed | 73 | view |
2019-10-07 | sridhar.samal80@gmail.com | 61 | view |
2019-08-16 | rer1 | 56 | view |
2019-08-16 | Aroraprerna | 61 | view |
- People often do not interact with their neighbours and this is harming community building What are the possible causes and solutions 77
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 61
- A foreign friend of yours plans to visit your place and stay with you but you do not have time on that date Give your friend another alternate date to come 70
- A foreign friend of yours plans to visit your place and stay with you but you do not have time on that date Give your friend another alternate date to come In your letter you should apology for it explain what you will busy for on that date suggest to him 10
- A foreign friend of yours plans to visit your place and stay with you but you do not have time on that date Give your friend another alternate date to come In your letter you should apology for it explain what you will busy for on that date suggest to him
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ect of having one universal language is the it would enhance the understanding between...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ce will lead to another negative point. If all national languages disappear there ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41355932203 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80011080341 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0426985581 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7222222222 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263077785038 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952663338625 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637729192165 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162313765698 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742920559151 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.