Irrefutably, it is debatable argument that director of industries receive more salaries than employees at lower positions. Some people find it it mandatory, while certain commentators hold it unwise. There exists strong controversy in both sides of this debate which can be analysed before reaching any conclusion.
Supporters of the former viewpoint put forward the idea that more responsible tasks are managed by directors. They assert that these are the managers who manage and distribute the responsibilities and work to the employees, which helps to to run the organisation smoothly. According to the survey on multinational companies, it was manifested that directors are only e behind the progress of any company. Therefore, they deserve high packages.
Defenders of the latter view content that ordinary workers' duties are more hard then the people at higher positions. They argue that other employees perform their duties for long and uncertain working hours, sometimes they also face unequal workloads. The study conducted on work related stress revealed that ordinary employees perform more physical work and exhaust their body physically that causes work stress on them and causes adverse mental health. Does it is unfair to pay them low salaries.
Having analysed both the views, I am personal incline towards staff former view point as the workers on high rank have more qualifications and training in administration, which day which they accumulated by studying, making hard efforts and paying a lot. Furthermore, they have mind power which they obtain from there professional training and helps them to plan and perform for the success of the company which , is not feasible for other employees.
In the final reckoning, although low rank employees work harder, the directors have to do administrative works, which they learn to use by doing higher professional programs.
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it is necessary but others hold that it is unfair Discuss both views and give your own opinions 73
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles Why are these changes happening Do you think these changes are positive and negative 56
- In today s society more and more work is done by machines Do you think the positive effects of these developments outweigh the negative effects on individuals and society 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...es at lower positions. Some people find it it mandatory, while certain commentators h...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n both sides of this debate which can be analysed before reaching any conclusion....
^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks are managed by directors. They assert that these are the managers who manage a...
^^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... and work to the employees, which helps to to run the organisation smoothly. Accordin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...t ordinary workers duties are more hard then the people at higher positions. They ar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...d causes adverse mental health. Does it is unfair to pay them low salaries. Havi...
^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: be
...d causes adverse mental health. Does it is unfair to pay them low salaries. Havi...
^^
Line 4, column 412, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...orm for the success of the company which , is not feasible for other employees. I...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41016949153 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87967868104 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2901346363 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146160655162 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514136436833 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461783480792 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842301572197 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513210787488 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.