Do you agree or that improvements in technology reduce the role of Olympic games

Essay topics:

Do you agree or that improvements in technology reduce the role of Olympic games?

At present, no one can deny that technology has reached the level as it was never before. Well, it has put the enormous impact on each and every field and discover the modern world. Whereas, some people assume the advancements in technology has weakened the role of Olympic games. I disagree with such statement and describe my views regarding it in upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, technology has boomed up the level of Olympic games in so many aspects. Firstly, development in equipment for sports and well-designed stadiums and gyms which helps athletes for better enhancement in their body including stamina and physically growth and training. Secondly, in past, athletes were only confined to their countries and typical areas but technology has given them global exposure.

Moreover, using highly advanced cameras in Olympic games has reduced the chance of unfair statements and cheating during game time. To illustrate, it's easy for judges to make any judgement by re watching the videos of specific shots and moments. Most importantly, technology enable us to watch live Olympic games from any part of the world which was hardly possible in the past. To support this as people watch Olympic games it sows the seed of sportsmanship and patriotism in their mind and encourage them to play for their country.

In nutshell, I can conclude that, undeniably, it's hard for every athlete to buy latest equipment's and stuff for their training which indirectly give birth to the gap between rich and poor and such things force some people to think negative about technology effects on Olympics but still There is no such way in technology has defamed or decreased the role of Olympic games.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-29 nobitaa 89 view
2024-06-18 vishal sachdeva 61 view
2024-06-14 asmita acharya 67 view
2024-06-14 asmita acharya 67 view
2024-06-13 asmita acharya 78 view
Essays by user vishal sachdeva :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ry field and discover the modern world. Whereas, some people assume the advancements in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ysically growth and training. Secondly, in past, athletes were only confined to their c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortsmanship and patriotism in their mind and encourage them to play for their cou...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'buy the latest'.
Suggestion: buy the latest
...deniably, its hard for every athlete to buy latest equipments and stuff for their training...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... training which indirectly give birth to the gap between rich and poor and such t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, well, whereas, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08571428571 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63468814713 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621428571429 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.8884473333 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229749872455 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843819228086 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757404001931 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134508867508 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338399972643 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.