Do you support that nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes? Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Only a few nations have successfully developed nuclear power. The uses of this technology are vast and beyond comparison to any existing setup in the world which makes it useful for both good and bad. I undoubtedly support that it should be used for the welfare of society and the general public. The purpose of this essay is to explain hazardous effects and the constructive ways in which it has been used nowadays.
Firstly, the calamities caused by using nuclear technology in a destructive manner are huge and irreversible. Because of the long residual effects and extended natural decaying process of nuclear elements, the aftereffects can be seen affecting the general public and future generations for long. Now that the governments know about these hazardous substances, it is their responsibility to put it to good use instead of causing harm to society. For Instance, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had wiped the life in the radius of 10 km within a few seconds and that area is still not suitable to rehabilitate due to the high percentage of radioactivity in the surrounding environment.
Despite the fact that this technology can be dangerous, scientists have tried to make good use of it such as in energy domains. Since the atom contains a vast amount of energy, if broken down, researchers have found a way to control and generate electricity from it by making a nuclear reactor. Even if it requires a lot of accuracy and precision to stabilize such a piece of machine, the result will be an endless supply of energy for decades. For example, a nuclear reactor can generate energy without intoxicating the environment as compared to coal or natural gas power plants.
Moreover, it can be used in the field of medical sciences to find different anomalies in the human body. In spite of the fact that the radioactive substances are harmful to humans, the controlled usages of radioactive material on specific areas of the body have been proven effective and non-hazardous. To illustrate, the X-ray machine’s capability to find out crack bones in the body helped medical science to cure the exact problem instead of finding the broken bone by wide opening the painful area, as done in medieval times.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that nuclear technology should be used and enhanced in order to have a cleaner environment and robust medical procedures. If governments of different nations come together in favour of not using this technology for destructive purposes, then our planet will be more habitable and safe for future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | samgautam007 | 73 | view |
- Do you support that nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes? Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. 73
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 82
- Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom.What are your opinions on this?Use your own knowl 73
- Some people say that productivity depends on how a building is constructed. Please provide advantages and disadvantages of the same. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...used for the welfare of society and the general public. The purpose of this essay is to explai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a destructive manner" with adverb for "destructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ties caused by using nuclear technology in a destructive manner are huge and irreversible. Because of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... aftereffects can be seen affecting the general public and future generations for long. Now th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his technology for destructive purposes, then our planet will be more habitable a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04195804196 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93598788924 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547785547786 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9510274975 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.235294118 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2352941176 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242605381716 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849097781288 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683545823338 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143899720192 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831290246644 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.