All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

Traditional fuel cars should be replaced by clean energy cars to avoid imbalance in the environment. I agree that electric cars are much cheaper and environmentally friendly. In this essay, the benefits of using electric vehicles will be discussed.

The operating cost of electric vehicles is lesser than that of mechanical cars which makes it a favorable alternative. Firstly, electricity is cheaper to produce than fossil fuels which require an expensive refining process. Electricity is generated from a number of renewable sources whereas fossils are the only source for fuels and are depleting rapidly. In addition, electric cars are battery operated and they have less moving parts which result in low maintenance cost. For instance, the yearly expenses of an electric car are 20% lesser than that of traditional cars.

Vehicles running on electricity are nature friendly because of zero emission. One of the main reasons that make electric cars environment friendly is that they do not release carbon dioxide. Since the cars are battery operated, hence, no combustion fuel takes place. This, in turn, helps the environment since the main cause of global warming is carbon dioxide. As a matter of fact, one-third of CO2 released in our atmosphere is emitted from non-electric vehicles. Moreover, most of the electric cars are made from recycled materials which makes it one of the best alternative to fuel cars.

To summarise, electric cars have exceptionally outweighed non-electric cars because they are ecofriendly and cost efficient.I agree that electric cars should replace fuel cars to have an ecological balance on earth.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-04 Amna Zeeshan 67 view
2024-01-04 Amna Zeeshan 67 view
2023-09-25 drmona.914 67 view
2023-06-12 drmona.914 61 view
2021-09-04 Meet Kanabar 77 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arly expenses of an electric car are 20% lesser than that of traditional cars. ...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...they are ecofriendly and cost efficient.I agree that electric cars should replace...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, moreover, so, third, whereas, for instance, in addition, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37984496124 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86698066794 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550387596899 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0448070767 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375423014629 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131751933687 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103334268568 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268474006095 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099841345934 0.056905535591 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.