Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes.Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Essay topics:

Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes.
Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Nuclear technology is one of the most well build inventions of 20th century but most of the people are in secure due to its unpredictable usage.Though we know that nuclear weapons are harmful threat to nature, like other inventions but still we even have a positive impact of it.

Firstly, the most prominent issue where most of the countries are now facing is energy crisis and they don’t have much gas to provide. In result, they rely on other countries and import them by paying a huge amount affecting the other developments. To overcome such situations nuclear power has been an asset for these countries to improve their life standards and economic status.

In support to the previous argument, undertaking nuclear technology is imperative if countries want to progress. Discovered nuclear supply technology will make the earth sustain for more than a century and if properly operated, it produces nothing other than heat, so it is considered super clean.

However, the midst of globalization, nuclear technology and power impose a great threat among many national frontiers. Improper use of this powerful technological gizmo, could lead to catastrophic effects. In such situation technology development seems meaningless for human who uses it in a negative aspect.

I would personally conclude by saying, development of technology in today’s world plays a prominent role to make life span easier but, in other hand it’s the responsibility of the human to make sure that nuclear power is positively utilized.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-19 Kikkuru 56 view
Essays by user Kikkuru :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Though
...n secure due to its unpredictable usage.Though we know that nuclear weapons are harmfu...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, well, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35245901639 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96996295006 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1726628029 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13271783679 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593708762774 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496170019226 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737653223879 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477773187249 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.