While some people think that smart phones play an important role in the learning process of students, others believe that excessive use of these devices does not help to achieve academic objectives. This essay is against / I am against the excessive use of smart phones among teenagers because after spending much of their time on these devices, teenagers are left with no time for their studies. Moreover, children do not like to play sports because they prefer to play games with their mobile phones.
When teenagers spend most of their time on mobile phones, it is natural that they will not have time for academic studies. The time spent on phones is not productive; therefore, traditional academic learning should be encouraged instead. Also, juveniles who are always glued to their phone use it excessively for chatting with their friends. While chatting is not particularly bad, the problem is that they use weird abbreviations and SMS lingos to convey ideas. Their conversation makes practically no sense to someone who is not familiar with this time. At the same time, they fail to learn to communicate using standard words and expressions. No doubt, this generation of students has poor written communication skills.
Spending excessive time on their phones also prevents students from reading. Earlier people used to read when they had free time. Actually, many of them made a conscious effort to find time to read something. These days, teens are constantly hooked to their phones. They read neither newspapers nor storybooks. Instead they keep themselves busy updating their social status. Needless to say, they have limited knowledge of the world they live in.
In conclusion, the use of mobile phones does not help in the learning process and hurts the literacy skills of young people. Hence, it is recommended that students limit the amount of time they spend on their phones.
Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors What other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 11
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors What other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 73
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors What other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 11
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors What other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay games with their mobile phones. When teenagers spend most of their time ...
^^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...read neither newspapers nor storybooks. Instead they keep themselves busy updating thei...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, hence, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08787878788 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55332947832 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548484848485 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9567858884 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9523809524 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0566351681851 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0187251721459 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399562560117 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0352612352944 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361585298963 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.