It is argued by a few individuals that extreme usage of mobile phones has detrimental effects on adolescent’s education. I completely agree with this statement. This essay will explain 2 fundamental reasons to illustrate how addiction to mobiles is causing a damaging effect on young children's academic scores.
Firstly, excess usage of cell phone is causing physical health problems, and thereby, affecting children’s academic performance. Although youngsters are cautioned by elders, about the negative ramifications produced by this gadget, children are still desperate to use them as they enjoy playing games and accessing social media. Moreover, many children are sacrificing sleep in order to spend more time with the gadget. As a result, youngsters are prone to various health problems such as loss of eye visibility, fatigue, obesity, etc. Thereby, they are unable to concentrate on academics and hence are failing to achieve viable scores. In a recent survey conducted by BBC among young children, it was found that only 50% of students who use mobile frequently were able to achieve average pass marks. On the other hand, 90% of students who do not consume mobile phone are able to achieve the same.
Another major concern is that, this is also resulting in mental health issues and thereby indirectly impacting student’s scores. Mobile games these days promote violence and children are certainly attracted to such games due to the thrill that they provide. However, this results in adverse effects on child’s psychological health as the child is constantly exposed to such fierce environment. Although the youngster’s play these games virtually, it is due to human psychology that they get impacted in their daily life due to the illusions that are formed in the brain. For instance, recent news reported that, 1929 teenager’s committed suicide globally as they were deeply involved in playing a game called Pub-G. Also, high performing students who got gradually addicted to this game have failed in the majority of subjects.
In conclusion, repeated usage of mobile device renders bad academic scores as students using this gadget get physically and mentally sick. Hence, mobile usage should be limited.
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors What other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 11
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors What other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 73
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors What other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 11
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors What other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e phone are able to achieve the same. Another major concern is that, this is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: APOSTROPHE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Consider using the plural form here: 'teenagers'.
Suggestion: teenagers
...stance, recent news reported that, 1929 teenager’s committed suicide globally as they were...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... repeated usage of mobile device renders bad academic scores as students using th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37891737892 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78338975801 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612535612536 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.15048852 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0297890738688 0.244688304435 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0121290832654 0.084324248473 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255779901564 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0184523782927 0.151304729494 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132507290572 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.