Education in financial management should be a mandatory component of the school program.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some would argue that management of finance should be a compulsory part of an educational curriculum in schools. Owing to this, I completely agree with this statement because it will help to boost the economy of the nation as well as acquisition of financial management skills could aid to manage money effectively.
The primary reason for the agreement is that country will become financially strong, when subjects related to wealth will be taught in educational institutes. This is because, the growth of any economy depends on the purchase capacity of its citizens, therefore, as they are aware with the financial management skills, correct decisions will be made by them which will strengthen the economy of the country. For example, in Japan, subject of finance management is mandatory in every schools and as a result, it is one of the strongest economy in the world. Therefore, compulsion of subjects related to finance is beneficial to concrete the economy of the nation.
The secondary for the agreement is that it would be fruitful for children to learn about the management of money in schools. That is to say that, importance of money will be understood by learners at younger age due to which they will become thrifty. Consequently, a good management of finance will lead towards a comfortable life and higher standard of living. To exemplify, a survey in Times of India showed that children who have learned the subject of financial management are way more economically stronger than others. Thus, it would be better to gain the knowledge of wealth management in schools.
In conclusion, to make a stronger economy as well as to live a prosperous life in terms of higher standard of living are two pivotal reasons to bolster the notion of compulsion of teaching subjects related to management of finance. Furthermore, it is recommended that complexity of topic should be understood by pupils effortlessly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to concrete the economy of the nation. The secondary for the agreement is that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11075949367 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95622301705 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496835443038 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.252616288 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218297542187 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804212415898 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562802677818 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144335359372 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788511794146 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.