Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Many organizations take scores of factors into account while inviting applications for a given job. The recruiters seek some additional personal information like marital status and leisure activities. Some say employers or recruiters should be confined to pertinent information while others are the proponent of this trend. I would present my support arguments for the former view.
Those who consider personal information as irrelevant say that the minimum required data is enough for any employer. For instance, an employer wants a marketing person would only need to see if the prospective incumbent possesses the relevant academic qualification and certain years of experience. The private data shows nothing about the applicant and may undermine the capabilities of other candidates. All applicants should be given fair chance irrespective of their marital status or hobbies.
On the other hand, I would argue that the job market is competitive not only because of a large number of experienced applicants seeking jobs but also a limited number of jobs. To illustrate this point, thousands of students are graduating in a number of disciplines every year and many are already in the market for the accumulation of experience. The recruiter when finds himself/herself in a dilemma of choosing from a large number of similar experience candidates restores to other factors to assess competencies. It’s generally believed that a married person will be more responsible as he carries the burden of the family. Furthermore, hobbies also shed lights on the behavioral perspective of the applicant. If a person only watches movies in his free time while other do some sports or voluntary work, would have an advantage.
To sum up, I strongly believe that requirements of extra details about oneself is justified and serve as a decisive factor in hiring
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | jeetender | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | PALAK AHUJA | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | MihirGosai | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Harrynguyen1980 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | namodi17 | 73 | view |
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree 61
- You and some friends at a meal at a restaurant to celebrate a special occasion, and you were very pleased with the food and service.Write a letter to the manager. In your letter•Give details of your visit to the restaurant•Explain the reason for the c 87
- Some people think that advertising on TV is useless and others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 75
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vi 84
- Write a letter to the governor of a local city council who is planning to pull down a historical building in your local area due to the lack of money to repair it. Explain:Why the building is important?What can be done with it in future?How to raise money 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rket is competitive not only because of a large number of experienced applicants seeking jobs but...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...f/herself in a dilemma of choosing from a large number of similar experience candidates restores ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36518771331 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06148481243 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617747440273 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5225124237 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225393681558 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701416677709 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434925013131 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122628538448 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765063173097 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.