Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interest and whether they are married or single. Some say that this information may be relevant and useful. Other disagrees. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The contentious argument that whether employers can solicit personal information from job applicants in the recruitment process has sparkled a heated debate for many years. Many believe that it is necessary to collect this kind of information whereas others claim that it is useless and holds no additional value. This essay will scrutinize both advantages and disadvantages before reaching to an opinion.
Many scholars from human resources advocates the benefits to the organization in acquiring the information about the prospective employees including hobbies, marital status and more. First and foremost, it enables multinational corporation to analyze whether the candidate is best fit for the position or not. For example, a vacancy which requires traveling to new places as job description, will seek for an interviewees who likes to travel a lot and is single, because the married aspirant will have marital commitments. Secondly, Hobbies and interests act as tool to pursue and engage staff in extracurricular activities to boost morale. To illustrate, many companies conduct employee engaging activities to promote team building and leadership, this information can make it more relevant to employees as well.
Conversely, these merits are definitely eclipsed with drawbacks; discriminatory practices and privacy concerns are few of them. There is a major concern about prejudiced decisions while selecting the contenders for a particular job. To exemplify, a recruiter can be biased based on his tastes and preferences, if he is fond of cricket, will favors an interviewees who loves and adore cricket too. Furthermore, Private information can be used to violate someone’s privacy. For an instance, the details of a female employee can be misused to stalk and harassed be a person who hates her, which in turns spoils the company’s reputation.
To conclude, having considered a range of arguments, I firmly opine that advantages of gathering such information’s clearly outweigh the disadvantages; employers can match applicants to vacancies and increase the employee retention rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-11 | anjalee990 | 89 | view |
- Today s typical methods of teaching involving direct communication between teachers and students will not exist by 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree and give reasons 66
- some people prefer to buy local products while other prefer international products Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interest and whether they are married or single. Some say that this information may be relevant and useful. Other disagrees. Discuss both views and give yo 89
- being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits.do you think that being a celebrity has more benefits or more problem? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an interviewee' or simply 'interviewees'?
Suggestion: an interviewee; interviewees
...laces as job description, will seek for an interviewees who likes to travel a lot and is single...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'favor'
Suggestion: favor
...erences, if he is fond of cricket, will favors an interviewees who loves and adore cri...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an interviewee' or simply 'interviewees'?
Suggestion: an interviewee; interviewees
..., if he is fond of cricket, will favors an interviewees who loves and adore cricket too. Furthe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64263322884 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27918866357 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64263322884 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4437847173 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23921527127 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742665874904 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420904262416 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136151780965 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477487392268 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.