In a modern era, the numerous challenging predicaments have been alleviated by the unprecedented technological evolutions. Hence, many people deem that it might lead to curb the ever-evolving global environmental concerns such as environmental pollutants, green house gases, rising seal-level and so on. This essay will elucidate the positive influence as well as the certain limitations of modern-technology on the environment.
Undeniably, the modern technological revolutions have already represented the remarkable impacts to circumvent plethora of environmental threats. There have been several pollutant gases, for example, emitted by the modern vehicles such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxides. Fortunately, university research confirmed that these harmful gases could be mitigated by adsorption on the green-catalysts surfaces, consequently, reducing the emission into the environment which might have disastrous consequences such as acid rain, rising sea-levels. Furthermore, there have been latest technology evolving to eliminate green-house gases emission by the giant chemical industries. To illustrate, not only by installing the environmental equipments such as packed bed tower, cyclones, industries but also getting modern state-of-art laboratory tools could actually save our nature.
However, this technological equipments have several limitations too. For instance, there have been many unsolved issues still persist such as climate change. To solve this, the famous scientists have been performing the numerous experiments, however, its still puzzled and intricate. In addition to the technology, the government might arrange some environment awareness campaigns such as speeches, poster presentations which undoubtedly enlighten the citizens about the major environmental threats. And due to this, people familiarize themselves on the environmental pollutants, eventually, taking the steps to reduce the plastic waste as well as plating the trees.
To recapitulate, due to the fact that technologies have several limitations in terms of years of research, I believe that the public awareness campaigns would certainly help to curb the global nature problems.
- The number of older people is increasing. Some people think it will cause the problem to their countries, others believe this group is important to society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- Write a letter to your former teacher. In your letterExplain how you heard about his/her retirementDescribe what made him/her such a great teacherSay how your teacher affected your life 89
- Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Because of modern technology it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but other believe that handwriting is still an important skills Discuss both views and give ur opinion 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'been the latest'.
Suggestion: been the latest
...ing sea-levels. Furthermore, there have been latest technology evolving to eliminate green-...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ming the numerous experiments, however, its still puzzled and intricate. In additio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21241830065 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37320286766 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1935663406 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.785714286 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0954520591106 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387245840466 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310261097593 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626956192448 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310723261168 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.74 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.