Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.
What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped?
Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Poverty is one of the biggest dilemmas of the world. There are enormous organizations working for poverty reduction by introducing different projects. Extensive amount of work is in progress in United Nations, particularly, in extreme deprived countries such as, Ethiopia and Africa. Unfortunately, this problem is growing every passing day and needs to be dealt with strong and long lasting measurements.
Mainly, third world countries are affected with poverty. Major issues due to this giant problem are population, lack of necessities and lack of education. Masses who are striving for day to day needs would not take important factors like quality education or healthy lifestyle, under consideration. To elucidate it further, evidently, wealth is not distributed in justified manner because of few countries monopoly and powerful people. An organization such as United Nations plays a dummy role bacause of intervention of these big giants ruling the world. Researchers found out that in countries like India and China, people are living beneath the poverty line; the main reason is over population.
There are many ways through which poverty can be trimmed down. Issue resolution should not only be considered as the responsibility of these NGOs, rather every individual should take the ownership and work around with minimal solutions in any possible way. The NGOs working for this purpose should be empowered enough to implement the solution in its true essence. Local Government should play its vital role in eliminating poverty by introducing different schemes. Likewise developed countries, everyone should be entitled for citizenship allowance. Wealth distribution equilibrium should be maintained. Government should allot certain budget for free education and medical facilities. Old age citizens should be entitled for old age benefits.
To recapitulate the aforementioned, everyone has a right to live a standard life with basic needs fulfilled. Unequal distribution of wealth is one of the fatal factors which must be addressed immediately. Currently, focus should be on providing people with basic necessities of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...uted in justified manner because of few countries monopoly and powerful people. An organi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...verty by introducing different schemes. Likewise developed countries, everyone should be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs fulfilled" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'fulfilling' or 'to be fulfilled'.
Suggestion: fulfilling; to be fulfilled
...o live a standard life with basic needs fulfilled. Unequal distribution of wealth is one ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ocus should be on providing people with basic necessities of life.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people with basic necessities of life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60802469136 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01986734236 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3843810426 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5238095238 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7619047619 7.06120827912 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206659700456 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603445965148 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347097131667 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116100064253 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331492467637 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.