Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.
What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped?
Two days ago, I read a newspaper article about how various nations tackle poverty. In the article, some social workers from Kazakhstan explain both why the number of poor people are growing in the country and how authorities may handle this situation. In this essay, I will analyze some of these reasons and suggest possible solutions.
Let us start with the reasons why poverty is on the growth. The first reason is that unemployment usually contributes to it. A multitude of people lead an impoverished lifestyle, because they cannot find an occupation in a shrinking labor market due to financial instability for a long time. Another reason is that high prices for food frequently aggravates it. Most needy families, for example, generally experience a further decrease in the quantity of accessible goods, since the prices are growing too frequently and exceeds the average family income. Therefore, after the analysis of these reasons, it is clear that Kazakhstan faces the issue of impoverishment.
However, numerous social workers claim that the country can tackle this problem by adopting the following steps. Firstly, they advise generating many employment opportunities. The way forward would be for the government to create plenty of available jobs for the jobless by opening both new plants and factories. Secondly, they recommend to make products affordable. To address the difficulty with expensive food, for instance, authorities should shorten the series of trailers, so that few trade companies add their margins to the final price. As a result, after the consideration of these solutions, it is obvious that it is probable to deal with poverty.
In conclusion, although there are a great deal of factors causing poverty in Kazakhstan, I believe that officials can relieve the suffering of indigent citizens, if they take the above mentioned actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | Tolik | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | DoaaOkaila | 61 | view |
- Walking is known to be beneficial for health and yet fewer people are walking there days.What are the reasons for this?What can be done to tackle this problem? 67
- In many countries, very few people read newspapers or follow the news on TV.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
- The younger generation is mainly responsible for latest technological developments How far do you agree 84
- Should the government provide people with free accommodation? 78
- There is an increasing trend around the world to have a small family rather than a large family What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of having a small family rather than a large family 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[1]
Message: Verbs 'advise' and 'remind' are used with infinitive: 'to generate'.
Suggestion: to generate
...e following steps. Firstly, they advise generating many employment opportunities. The way ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 43, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
... conclusion, although there are a great deal of factors causing poverty in Kazakhsta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34006734007 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87084773423 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639730639731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1123347465 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224557769411 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055652805605 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480989557746 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113807809624 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419986061578 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.