‘Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.’
How far do you share this viewpoint?
Today in all societies, the number of citizens who cannot earn a basic living wage to make ends meet has increased; In this situation, nonprofit organizations may play a crucial role to improve the poor social status. It seems to me that every member of society should regularly make a donation of a constant amount of their salary to voluntary organizations, and I will explain why in this essay.
Firstly, foundations might play a crucial role to combat poverty in any societies. They can help the poor by raising money and spending it on their basic necessities. This may result in boosting their standard of living and their quality of life. For example, charitable institutions can provide poor people with basic accommodation, education and health care, so these factors might make them ready for the labour market and finding a full-time job. A second reason for donating money is that society may benefit from it. The charity organization by educating and improving social status of poor people may lead to the reduction of crime and brutality in society. This will increase safety and peace in the community; therefore it will work to the advantage of all city dwellers. This leads us on to the final, and perhaps most significant benefit of donation, which is the improvement of social equality. This may happen when the gap between the poor and the rich in a society become less and less. To do so, these organization may help to distribute wealth equally among people and get rid of inequality and discrimination. The money donated will truly support foundations to benefit society and provide a better place for living of all its members.
While it may be correct that saving money is much better than donating it because everyone may need it for a rainy day. It still appears to be the case, however, that is kind of social investment which will benefit all members of society by creating a peaceful and safe environment for them to live.
In conclusion, I believe donating part of our salary regularly may reduce the poor population, increase common good and social equality as well. This is not to say that all people with different social status should donate, but it appears to be the rich should make many more contribution to nonprofit organizations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and I will explain why in this essay. Firstly, foundations might play a crucia...
^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... raising money and spending it on their basic necessities. This may result in boosting their stan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 908, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is the improvement of social equality. This may happen when the gap between the poo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1012, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this organization' or 'these organizations'?
Suggestion: this organization; these organizations
...society become less and less. To do so, these organization may help to distribute wealth equally a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontribution to nonprofit organizations.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9067357513 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74193640592 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520725388601 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3753234584 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.411764706 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10557857098 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394831241306 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038712403881 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703346165776 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325146396475 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.