‘Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.’
How far do you share this viewpoint?
The number of citizens who cannot earn a basic living wage has increased consistently in all communities; therefore, in this situation, nonprofit organizations may play a crucial role to improve the poor social status. It seems to me that every member of society should regularly make a donation of a constant amount of their salary to voluntary organizations, and I will explain why in this essay.
Firstly, foundations can play a crucial role to combat poverty in any societies. Fortunately, they may help the poor by raising money and spending it on their basic necessities. This may result in boosting their standard of living and their quality of life. For example, charitable institutions can provide poor people with basic accommodation, education opportunity and health care services, so that make them ready to compete in the labour market and find a full-time job. A second reason for donating money is that all walks of life would benefit from it. The charitable organization by educating and raising social awareness can lead to the reduction of crime and brutality in society. This will increase safety and peace in the community; therefore, it will work to the advantage of all city dwellers. This leads us on to the final, and perhaps most significant benefit of donation, which is the improvement of social equality. This may happen when the gap between the poor and the rich in a society become less and less. To do so, these organization may help to distribute wealth equally among people and get rid of inequality and discrimination. The money donated will truly support foundations to benefit society and provide a better place for living of all us. Thus donating regularly may help to make the world a better place to live.
It may be correct that saving money is much better than donating it because everyone may need it for a rainy day. Despite this, it still appears to be a kind of social investment which will benefit all members of society by creating a peaceful and safe environment for them to live.
In conclusion, I believe donating part of our salary regularly might reduce the poor population, work for the common good and reduce social equality as well. This is not to say that all people with different social status should donate, but it appears to be the rich should make many more contribution to nonprofit organizations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and I will explain why in this essay. Firstly, foundations can play a crucial ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... raising money and spending it on their basic necessities. This may result in boosting their stan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 934, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is the improvement of social equality. This may happen when the gap between the poo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1038, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this organization' or 'these organizations'?
Suggestion: this organization; these organizations
...society become less and less. To do so, these organization may help to distribute wealth equally a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontribution to nonprofit organizations.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9373433584 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82468927131 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511278195489 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1568822146 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114065992516 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405191766648 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367115272862 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765660572597 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271426893174 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.