Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Essay topics:

Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local
residents to visit important sites and monuments. I completely disagree with this idea.

The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that cultural or
historical attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which means that
the resident population already pays money to these sites through the tax system. However,
I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of
the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services,
including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The governments and inhabitants of
every country should be happy to subsidies important tourist sites and encourage people
from the rest of the world to visit them.

If travelers realized that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural
attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on
holiday. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on
visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral.
These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote
the nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices,
there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important
buildings.

In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas,
and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-15 Ragesh R 56 view
2018-07-15 Ragesh R 61 view
Essays by user Ragesh R :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, as to, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31598513011 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8628831812 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561338289963 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4685832747 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.38176352705 434% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193673419618 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767738340254 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444145673023 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560221203412 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508288131558 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.