Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is some times argued that tourists from abroad are to pay more than the local visitors. However, I do agree with the statement certainly because it helps in building up the nations revenue and also helps bearing the cost of restoring and maintenance of these places which involves a huge amount.
A nations revenue is largely effected from the income received by foreign expeditions. Tourist from overseas are charged more than the local visitors so as to bring about a drastic rise in the economic status. It is believed that nations with high economic conditions are considered to be wealthy. For instance the entrance fee collected at various historical centers greatly effects the growth of income.
Secondly, charging high fees from foreigners will not be unethical as they are already benefited with the high currency value of their respective countries. Since most of the currency exchange rates are very high, and they would ultimately spend less money for the tickets. Generally most of the Asian countries like India, China etc. currency values are very low compared to the developed countries where the tourists are coming from. For example, the currency value of US and most of the European countries are very high compared to Indian currency.
In conclusion, I agree that the nations economic status and the restoration of places that are of cultural and historical importance are tremendously effected by the income received from the foreign visitors.
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously?Give reasons for your answer and include relevant example from your own knowledge 61
- Wealthy should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disaster. Do you agree or disagree. 56
- Write a letter to you friend stating you have moved to a new city In your letter explain the following Why did you move to new place Describe the place you are living Invite your friend to come and see you Start your letter with Dear Anna you don t have t 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...nly because it helps in building up the nations revenue and also helps bearing the cost...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to bear' or 'bear'.
Suggestion: to bear; bear
...g up the nations revenue and also helps bearing the cost of restoring and maintenance o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...aces which involves a huge amount. A nations revenue is largely effected from the in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...re charged more than the local visitors so as to bring about a drastic rise in the econo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome received from the foreign visitors.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19246861925 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62408819085 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564853556485 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6763049303 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.416666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169726010548 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592447716023 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492814283915 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108718852573 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424313711758 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.