Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opini

Essay topics:

Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.

With the advanced feature of technology, some people argue that providing lectures in the hall to a bunch number of students is an ancient way of teaching and instead we focus on modern technology for teaching. This essay explains both these views first it will discuss the cost-effectiveness of modern technology. Secondly, technological infrastructure might not be a viable option for everyone.

Learning via the internet always provides a cost-effective solution for both institutions and their
pupils. The institution can manage a lecture easily from a tiny room through the internet.
For example, modern learning institutions like Edureka, Udemy has an online learning facility which
might be cost-effective for them. That is why they can manage their courses in a lot cheaper way
than the traditional method.

On the opposite side, people who favor the traditional method of teaching always argue that
technological facilities may not be an available option for everyone. Not everyone is blessed to have a computer and internet facility. For instance, many parts in our country(Bangladesh), people
do not have the internet and computer facility to have modern teaching benefits.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that both of these methods have their own pros and cons.
So, People who do not have the technological facility may sure go for a traditional way of learning,
where as others easily move to technological way to learn new things.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-09 Rahat 56 view
Essays by user Rahat :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... go for a traditional way of learning, where as others easily move to technological way...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19775300122 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560344827586 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9023335335 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 4.38176352705 274% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163038646455 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606895898598 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539089046337 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556632950426 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480348351219 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.