Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatres, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that the authorities should aid in the arts while others are convinced in funding on the public sector. Finding a balance between these paths of donating is a question for the government to tackle.
Supporting arts is not a waste of taxpayers` money as some people argue. Entertainment has always been daily for people all over the world. Working five days a week, having a side responsibilities, caring about people all these factors can be underestimated. Visiting theatres or museums, a jazz concert could be a sip of fresh air from daily routine. If the authorities had not aided some funds in the arts, the planet would not have ever known about Michael Jackson. This is why people should not be mad at the government because one of their duty is to provide some sort of pleasure to us.
Public services have always been requiring aid from the government. Unfortunately, there is a group of people who do not care about being entertained because they spend their lives in shelters. The government has duties and supports this sector is one of them but the reality is often disappointing. If the government had funded in shelters at Skid Row, this tries would not have minimized the number of homeless people. People who do not desire to change anything even with support from the authorities. In other words, donations should be calculated and not be overestimated in terms of priority choice.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the best solution is to find and keep the balance of assistance for social aspects under the government`s control.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-07-21 omuruzua 78 view
2020-07-18 Ojimson 78 view
2020-06-15 toyin 61 view
2020-03-05 exclight 61 view
2020-03-04 exclight 61 view
Essays by user exclight :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'responsibility'?
Suggestion: responsibility
...Working five days a week, having a side responsibilities, caring about people all these factors ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in conclusion, sort of, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96254681648 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94732044534 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588014981273 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4098340838 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137469367921 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483557211011 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413724964216 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830541433455 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216753553108 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.