The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public.
To what extent do you agree?
Space has always appealed to many people, who want to answer the question about the existence of life on other planet. Therefore, some scientists in space deny the fact of that countries are pointlessly funding their study of space. This essay is opposed to their refusal for the following reasons.
The first reason is that search for life in cosmos takes a great deal of resources, but brings few benefits to humans at present. To examine the surface of another planet, scientists need powerful computers, telescopes and space shuttles, but such expenses generate relatively benefit for society. Another argument is that the money allocated to such ambitious goals should be used to support poor people. Many people live in unsatisfactory conditions and suffer from malnutrition so instead of squandering money on space programs the government could improve the quality of life in impoverished areas. Moreover, such attempts in finding non-terrestrial organisms always end to no avail. Despite exploiting the state-of-the-art technologies, scientists yet have not found any signs of life on the other planets of the solar system.
Nevertheless, some scientists claim that attempts in detecting creatures in cosmos should continue at the same cost. They justify their opinion by the fact that they make other inventions while preparing devices for exploring other planets. Many apparatus, such as computers, the Internet and mobile phones, were devised as part of the mission of sending astronauts into space and landing on the Moon. Another argument is that the results of experiments in outer space find application in other areas of life. For example, computers, that were initially used for space programs, are now widely used in medicine and calculation. Furthermore, the study of universe raises the image of the country. Nations, which are engaged in space exploration, usually attract the attention of the whole world as well as investors.
In conclusion, even though some scientists think that people should keep exploring the space for aliens, I think that they have explored enough, and it is the time to draw attention to social issues.
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped? 84
- You have received a letter from your bank, asking you to acknowledge receipt of a new bank card. However, the card was missing from the envelope.Write a letter to the bank's head office. In your letter:explain why you are writingexpress concern about 78
- Nowadays people have adopted an unhealthy lifestyle Why do think this is How could this problem be solved 20
- Walking is known to be beneficial for health and yet fewer people are walking there days.What are the reasons for this?What can be done to tackle this problem? 84
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33137829912 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84346503128 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1922900073 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.941176471 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126505403501 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375006746464 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425206939056 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773481131184 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032439485862 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.