Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
For the last thirty years, governments have been spent more budget on the building of new highways and repairing roads, than on developing of railroads. It is thought by some people that improvement of the current railroad system will benefit the whole population and environment. Therefore, more money should be spent on the building of new stations and railroads. I totally agree with this statement. I think, that improved railroad’s network will bring a lot of advantages to every large city.
Firstly, it is well-known fact, that car or vehicle emissions are polluting our air. Besides, while car’s engine idles in a traffic jam, it produces in two times more amounts of carbon dioxide. Secondly, cars are not able to carry on as many passengers or quantities of goods as train does. And finally, contemporary railroad transport could be much faster than simple lorries or buses. To give a clear example, there is modern express in Japan that can achieve up to four hundred kilometers per hour. However, there such technology is currently impossible in my native country due economical unset. So, I want to give a clear example about more feasible solution of this problem.
I want to tell about Ukrainian city which named Kharkiv. This is a vast city in comparing with other Ukrainian cities with a pretty bad road system. There are very narrow streets, so gridlocks are essential part of this city. But there is a real salvation for Kharkiv inhabitants is a subway. It’s not so fast as Japanese train, but it much faster and cheaper than a local transport. So, there is no need to spend your time for a traffic jam.
In conclusion, I’d like to say that governments should spend country’s budget wisely and remember about every kind of transport that’s available in our country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | ermukesh09 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | umairhassan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | Prabhp | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Prabhp | 61 | view |
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. 67
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. 67
- Some people believe that sport has an important role in society Others however feel that it is nothing more than a leisure activity for some people 87
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for poorer nations. However the governments of richer nations should take more resposibility for helping poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people like to wear fashionable clothes. Why do you think this is a case? Is this a good thing or a bad thing? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'local transport'.
Suggestion: local transport
...in, but it much faster and cheaper than a local transport. So, there is no need to spend your tim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247933884298 0.247107183377 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.121212121212 0.155533422707 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101928374656 0.0946595960268 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0550964187328 0.0501214627716 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0413223140496 0.0437548338989 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126721763085 0.122226691241 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0220385674931 0.0403226058552 55% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78958529165 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220385674931 0.0326793684256 67% => OK
Particles: 0.00275482093664 0.00163938923432 168% => OK
Determiners: 0.0661157024793 0.0861772015684 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0165289256198 0.021408717616 77% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00550964187328 0.011925033212 46% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1824.0 1933.35771543 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 316.048096192 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0198019802 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.353135313531 0.374742101984 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.273927392739 0.28420135186 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211221122112 0.203846283523 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135313531353 0.137316102897 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78958529165 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.037074148 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630363036304 0.56093040696 112% => OK
Word variations: 73.5666204697 60.7387585426 121% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.9473684211 20.7743622355 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.373427084 49.517814964 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 127.492653851 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 20.7743622355 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.789473684211 0.814263465372 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 43.340107695 49.1944974215 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.82278481013 1.69124875643 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173210743432 0.332605444948 52% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0721910404604 0.102741220458 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0630258536694 0.0668466124924 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.424782101123 0.534860350844 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.179375133247 0.148594505496 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606159429101 0.134430193775 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474016298055 0.0742795772207 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.181314951393 0.324371583561 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0697943498637 0.0638462369009 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102663007645 0.228012699653 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218301211595 0.058150111329 38% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.41683366733 293% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 1.9629258517 408% => Less neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.