A growing numbers of cities are making their centres pedestrian only zones What are the advantages and disadvantages

Population density forced the municipality officials to take some measures in order to control heavy traffics in the downtown. It is becoming increasingly popular among the cities to ban the commuting of any motorized vehicles. The argument that allowing people to pass the city centers just on foot is repudiated and supported by many. This essay will analyze this argument before declaring a position.

To begin with, the proponents of this trend believe that it can help reduce the amount of airborne pollutant in the air. For instance, consider a car-free downtown without any exhaustion of fumes in the air can help us inhale higher quality air. This approach enables people to enjoy pure air and forces them to leave their sedentary lifestyle aside and walk for some hours. Thus, this process not only helps the environment but also the people by actuating them to do some exercises.

An alternative position argues that it is against the fast pace of life since all people like to do their works in less time. For example, not being able to drive your car to the downtown can delay your personal affairs. This trend does not move in tandem with the pace of living nowadays and can cause annoyance. Therefore, the perpetual prevention of vehicles into the city centers seems to be inapplicable.

As mentioned aforesaid, the pros and cons find this argument controversial. While, it may be considered an Eco-friendly activity and is prosperous for people, its negative consequence is its conflict with modern and quick way of living. However, this drawback can be resolved should the guidance and driving officials consider this prohibition just in rush hours. In conclusion, I hope that this kind of environmentally friendly activities will become prevalent in the foreseeable future.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s argument before declaring a position. To begin with, the proponents of this tr...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12925170068 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78848507888 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5208236972 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.25 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0442928063491 0.244688304435 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0160911523601 0.084324248473 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210147960427 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0286361965993 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171146880418 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.