An increasing number of developing countries are expanding their tourist industry. Why do you think it is the case? And do you think it is positive?
A large number of underdeveloped nations are promoting their tourism sector. I believe this trend aids to the country's economy, which is definitely a positive progression.
To begin with, more tourists means that it will boost nation's economy. When large number of people visit a nation to see tourist attractions then they use various facilities such as local transport, hotels and restaurants. As a result, the taxes paid to use these facilities aid to nation's economic growth. For instance, Singapore is one of the richest country in Asia continent, and 65% of its revenue comes from tourism sector only.
This trend is a pragmatic shift because it generates more jobs for local people. This is to say that to cater the needs of tourists more hotels, cafeterias and transport facilities are started. Thus, to match the demand and supply of tourism industry more jobs are created. As a result, many people are recruited to run the businesses and facility centers. For example, as per the report by Harvard Business School, 65% of the jobs in Thailand are due to its tourism sector.
To conclude, more number of less developed nations are promoting their tourism sector because it boosts the country's growth trajectory. In my opinion, it is a positive trend because enormous job opportunities are created to match the requirements of tourism domain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
A large number of underdeveloped nations are promoting th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...ive progression. To begin with, more tourists means that it will boost nations econom...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09865470852 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75090818229 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560538116592 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8706385856 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.4615384615 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086757624775 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341040113738 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035987670347 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685027936318 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385967832277 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.