An increasing number of developing countries are expanding their tourist industry. Why do you think it is the case? And do you think it is a positive trend?
As per the internet search trend report by Google, 38% of the users use the internet to find information about tourist places. It is a fact that a large number of underdeveloped nations are promoting their tourism sector. I believe this trend aids to the country's economy, which is definitely a positive progression.
To begin with, more tourists means that it will boost nation's economy. When large number of people visit a nation to see tourist attractions then they use various facilities such as local transport, hotels and restaurants. As a result, the taxes paid to use these facilities aid to nation's economic growth. For instance, Singapore is one of the richest country in Asia continent, and 65% of its revenue comes from tourism sector only. Hence, many countries are focusing on improving the hospitality sector to gain more revenue.
This trend is a pragmatic shift because it generates more jobs for the local people. This is to say that to cater the needs of tourism more hotels, cafeterias and transport facilities are started. Thus, to match the demand and supply of tourism industry more jobs are created. As a result, many people are recruited to run the businesses and facility centers. For example, as per the report by Harvard Business School, 65% of the jobs in Thailand are due to its tourism sector.
To conclude, more number of less developed nations are promoting their tourism sector because it boosts the country's growth trajectory. In my opinion, it is a positive trend because enormous job opportunities are created to match the requirements of tourism domain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...about tourist places. It is a fact that a large number of underdeveloped nations are promoting th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...ive progression. To begin with, more tourists means that it will boost nations econom...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, then, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04150943396 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72583463169 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539622641509 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7528010044 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105495427279 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388604406385 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369244945625 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802993432491 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480975241351 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.