Owing to globalization, the industries like hospitality, aviation, and tourism have increased tremendously in the last decade. Developing countries are putting each and every effort to make tourism sector grow. While expanding the tourism industry is justifiable. But, it shouldn't be done at the expense of the basic needs of the nation.
One school of people who says it is a positive development put forth these benefits. The first and foremost is revenue generation. The places of attraction are visited by international visitors. They stay and spend money over there and thus bringing prosperity for the host country with them. Second, such expansions also lure foreign investments. This leads to a growth in the infrastructure of that area.
Next, it also provides handsome employment opportunities to the local people and helps them to upgrade the standard of their lives.
Besides this, the foreign visitors are attracted to local arts and culture. Such exposure is always advantageous to particular cultures as they become more popular across the world. What is more, revenue generated from tourists can be used for the betterment of indigenous people and environment.
On the other hand, developing countries are already tackling the problems of health care, education, and so on. If governments continue spending hefty amounts on the tourism industry this will create frustration in the minds of its citizens who are struggling to meet their basic needs. Moreover, expansion and maintenance come side by side. It is seen many times that tourists throw rubbish like plastic bags, cans, etc. This raises not only the cost of maintenance for the government but also creates a threat to the environment of that nation.
All in all, I firmly believe that expansion of tourist attracted places is a positive development. Provided it shouldn't come at the cost of basic necessities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ery effort to make tourism sector grow. While expanding the tourism industry is justi...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ourism industry is justifiable. But, it shouldnt be done at the expense of the basic nee...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s of health care, education, and so on. If governments continue spending hefty amo...
^^
Line 8, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... is a positive development. Provided it shouldnt come at the cost of basic necessities.
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 140, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...rovided it shouldnt come at the cost of basic necessities.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29235880399 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91166020443 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3619692255 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8571428571 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61904761905 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125042093625 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311726266819 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366464302248 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564520335987 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324986661765 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.