Individuals can do nothing to change society. New developments can be only brought about by governments and large institutions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether new developments in society can only be brought by government and not by individuals has always been a matter of debate. Although it can never be denied that federal bodies and large corporates have the requisite power and resources to bring such changes which can help change the society for better however in my opinion, individual contributions are vital too for innovations and implementation of such policies therefore both entities must work hand in hand for a positive changes in society. In this essay we will discuss both sides of the argument with relevant examples.
First and foremost elected policy makers in any nation can only facilitate its citizens by providing modern facilities of innovation then it is up to an individual’s potential to utilize such resources for betterment of society. For example in China, the Chinese government is funding many scholars from China Technology University on research for alternative sources of energy which can help to reduce the environmental pollution.
Secondly large companies provide modern facilities and funding for research and development project to its engineers for innovation. For instance recently technology giant Space-X made headlines when they launched and tested the first reusable rocket into the space which can save millions of dollars, thanks to individual contributions from some the brightest minds.
Lastly individual’s inventions of life saving drug Penicillin by Alexander Fleming which helped save millions of lives globally can’t also be ignored. Similarly American scientist Thomas Elva Edison who made significant inventions in Electricity power generation, mass communication are helping our society to live a comfortable life.
In conclusion it is evident from the above examples that although public administration bodies and large companies have a larger role to play for new developments in society however individual contributions have also helped the society from time to time therefore both must work together for the prosperity of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | Yusuf Patel | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | vinshu koul | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | vinshu koul | 73 | view |
- You are due to start an English language course next week but you will not be able to because you have some problems.Write a letter to the manager of the language school, Sally Flannigan. In your letter:explain your situationdescribe your problemstell him 67
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. (opinion) Therefore, the working hours should be reduced.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- write a letter complaining about accommodation 11
- You have recently moved to a different house.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter•Explain why you have moved•Describe the new house•Invite your friend to come and visit 84
- Write a letter to your English speaking friend telling him her about a local event that is to take place in your town which would be useful to her him In your letter Mention the event What are the activities involved Mention the arrangements you would mak 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...es globally can't also be ignored. Similarly American scientist Thomas Elva Edison w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66134185304 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09719321714 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58785942492 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.6011682163 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.2 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4 7.06120827912 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206693473668 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916558064819 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874545793361 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115554905952 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705168270225 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.14 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.