The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels such as gas, oil, and coal.to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion.
The international community is responsible for indicating how and in what way fossil fuels should be consumed in countries. It appears that the decrease in consumption of fossil fuels is a long-term and team process.
Firstly, the international community could not ensure the decrease of the use of fuels lonely meaning that governments must cooperate with the international community by making some rules and policies by which fuel consumption can be controlled in their countries as well as educating people via social media. In other words, if people were been aware of the lack of resources of fuels, they would be able to accompany with their own states further. In addition, perhaps a second and most significant drawback of quick action, in this case, is that the final goal would seem more inaccessible. This is because it could be quite difficult not only for governments but also for people to plan on reducing the consumption of fossil fuels like oil, gas, and coal.
It is true that the resources of fossil fuels are limited and the international community is in charge of the decrease in the use of them with some effective solutions. Despite this, it seems that the aim which is the limitation on the use of fuel could be achieved with the help of either governments or people.
To conclude, although the international community should make some approaches to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, the process needs to be planned for a long time in which governments and people can help the international community.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, so, well, in addition, as well as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00389105058 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90601309541 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505836575875 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0706487166 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.888888889 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265155501381 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116055027086 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546655549476 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164911074733 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492108399944 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.