You have received a letter from your local video shop claiming that a DVD you rented is now overdue. However, you have already returned the DVD. Write to the video shop. In your letter
Tell them which film the letter is about
Explain when you returned it
Tell them what you would like them to do about the situation
Dear Mr. Lopez,
I am writing with regard to a DVD you have asked me about in your letter which I have received from your shop. First of all, it is necessary to remind you that I rented a comedy film, Funny Moments, on the 3rd of July. Then I returned it the following weak on the 10th of July as you wanted me to do. In addition, when I wanted to return the DVD, I could not find you in the shop and just your assistant was there. Therefore, I had to give it to him.
When I received your letter, I was so surprised. As you know, I have always been one of your on time costumers.
It might be the mistake of your assistant because when I arrived shop to return the DVD, he was too busy and the shop was too crowded. On top of these, he was calling on the phone. Could you check your inventory once again and ask your assistant carefully. It is possible, he has forgotten where has put. If you find it, please inform me.
I expect to hear good news from you.
Sincerely,
Sarah Smith
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, therefore, as for, as to, in addition, mind you, you know, first of all, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 32.9175257732 131% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 937.175257732 86% => OK
No of words: 195.0 206.0 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.14871794872 4.54256449028 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2059986356 2.54303337028 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 127.690721649 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574358974359 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.13402061856 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 16.3608247423 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2637728938 44.8134815571 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 57.7857142857 76.5299724578 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9285714286 16.8248392259 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 4.34317383033 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474841769617 0.216113520407 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142477981725 0.0766984524023 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116560542948 0.0603063233224 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285707389531 0.12726935374 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123305499585 0.0580467560999 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.1 8.37731958763 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 70.7449484536 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 7.45979381443 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.2 8.71597938144 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.31 7.59969072165 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 41.2886597938 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 8.54432989691 84% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 8.15463917526 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.