The Internet provides us with information about life and cultures of different countries and some people say it is not necessary to visit these countries to learn about them. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
Thanks to the advancement in the field of information technology it is quite convenient to people to know about the different cultures and lifestyles from different part of the world on the contrary to olden days when people would travel a lot to know about the citizens of other nations and their traditions and customs. However, I believe that visiting other parts of the world would give good exposure and experience where any technology fails.
Admittedly, the human being has grown up to a level where they can have anything by sitting in their bedroom. Even modern schools, hospitals and business centres have equipped with many gadgets and instruments which help them to get access to world-class libraries which are located in different universities in different countries, to avail medical treatments including major operations from without travelling, and arranging business meetings without sparing much of time. Hence, these facilities have proved that it is a waste of time and money to commute to different parts of the world for different purposes.
However, the advocates who stand in favour of travelling commonly say that it is a major contributor to one’s personality and experience where technology lacks. In other words, when individuals move to other areas of the globe giving chances to socialize and face different issues a person’s confidence and lifestyle will get renovated. It further leads him/her to be more empathetic and supportive to fellow human beings as he/she knows about the harsh realities of life people suffer beyond the boundaries own nation. As the history of many great personalities proves they gained a page in history as a result of travelling beyond the hills and seas.
To conclude, although state-of-the-art technology has a strong hand in providing in-depth and real-time knowledge about the lives of people from other sides of the planet earth without commuting, I feel that travelling to those continents only gives the real knowledge and experience to the people making them a perfect social animal.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, i feel, as a result, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28181818182 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87577034834 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572727272727 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.341611547 49.4020404114 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.3 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157902594369 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542980791857 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431744836953 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931735992728 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288972569854 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.