It has always been the case that they take into account the amount of rights a person has given their background and experience.It has always been the case that people's pay is based on their background and experience. Therefore, in most countries, high-level people in a company receive higher salaries than younger employees.l agree and i will explain my reasons in the following paragraphs.
It has always been the case that they take into account the amount of rights a person has given their background and experience.It has always been the case that people's pay is based on their background and experience. Therefore, in most countries, high-level people in a company receive higher salaries than younger employees.l agree and i will explain my reasons in the following paragraphs.
In every country there are different laws to pay for salaries.But the important thing is that in most countries the rights of higher officials are more than their employees.And that always annoys low-level employees. Not only are employees doing the most work in the company, but if they are not, the work of the company will fail.Employees of a company are frustrated by the gap between their pay and higher salaries and may leave the company.Some employees may go on strike.As a result, the company will face a major challenge.However, these actions can hardly be productive and valuable. Thus, unfair pay systems like this provide an unhealthy work environment for both employers and employees.
On the other hand, when a higher official gets more salaries, it gives the company full power and imposes all its duties on others. It also causes the company to suffer financially.
And when they have a lot of power and they decide on all parts of the company. Getting higher salaries is totally unfair.
In conclusion, I am opposed to the allocation of the highest salaries to the higher authorities and it is better to apply the law of fair pay between the professional and the authorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...s given their background and experience.It has always been the case that peoples p...
^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ries than younger employees.l agree and i will explain my reasons in the followin...
^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... are different laws to pay for salaries.But the important thing is that in most cou...
^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...officials are more than their employees.And that always annoys low-level employees....
^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Employees
... not, the work of the company will fail.Employees of a company are frustrated by the gap ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...gher salaries and may leave the company.Some employees may go on strike.As a result,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...company.Some employees may go on strike.As a result, the company will face a major...
^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...the company will face a major challenge.However, these actions can hardly be productive...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03007518797 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92407987048 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545112781955 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.5156600781 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347350226366 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126581402887 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.261951746426 0.0667982634062 392% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182055375215 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.274908809293 0.056905535591 483% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.