It’s good to have English as a global language. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your reasons and include relevant examples from your own experience.
It is not an exaggeration to mention that vernaculars are one of a driven-forces of human evolution. As one of the most popular language, there is an argument to consider English as a global tongue. However, in my opinion, I believe a variety of cultural and sociological differences are there because of the vernacular differences among people. Therefore, I strongly disagree to make English as a universal language.
It is undeniable that having a common tongue could greatly improve communication. Since English is a widely spread and alive language, if everybody started to speak in the same tongue there would not be language barriers and which could result in more effective dissemination of information. For instance, those who use different vernaculars frequently faced with translation issues as well as communication issues. In fact, these problems are excessively contributing to global business and technological development. Moreover, people of non-English speaking countries have to spend considerable amount of time to master the language which could have been used for other important skill development if English could treat as a global language.
However, cultural differences are the core factors which make the world a beautiful place. Not to mention that the travel and tourism industry is totally based on this and without much variety there would be nothing to enjoy. Evidently, UNESCO is protecting such vernaculars as a world heritage for future generations. Furthermore, if everybody started to communicate in the same tongue the abundance of dialects and cultures would be vanished in a very short time. Although English can ease up business and technological advancements, the world would be a monotonous place within a couple of centuries.
In conclusion, despite the advantages of business and development of making English as a global language, I believe by doing so, the indirect impact to the different cultures could be detrimental.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | virtualpathum | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | Amin Amiri | 84 | view |
- A family member is coming to stay with you. He/she will be arriving by train in the morning, but you won’t be home until the evening. Write a letter to your relative. In your letter:– explain the arrangements you have made for them to get keys and ent 73
- Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children, while others feel it should be purely optional. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- You are having a graduation party next Saturday night You have invited 50 people to celebrate at an outdoor barbecue evening which may continue into late into the night Write a letter to your elderly neighbour In your letter explain what will be happening 83
- It is believed that children from countries with a high level of unemployment should be offered only primary education and should not be offered with a secondary education as it is unlikely they will get a job in the future anyway Do you agree or disagree 61
- You recently went on a business trip and stayed in a hotel On getting home you realised you left some things at the hotel Write a letter to the manager stating Details of your stay The items you left behind What you want the manager to do 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47712418301 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21884642001 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545751633987 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1497080766 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.733333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126868692766 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438941178857 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457932463166 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825912484802 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354826871786 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.