Some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead, they should spend the money on housing and road development. To what extent do you agree?
Although it is thought by some that it is more important to spend money for housing and road development than spending on the restoration of old buildings by the government, I believe the government should allocate money for protecting heritage buildings.
There is no doubt that housing and road development projects are important. Most of the cities are bustling with traffic due to poor road planning and infrastructure issues. Moreover, the lack of housing is also a pressing matter in the majority of cities. If governments do not allocate money for such developments in cities it would affect the people. Since the population is growing rapidly, their transportation and housing requirements are also increasing. Proper development of such facilities improves the quality of life profoundly in the cities as well as it has other significant advantages such as time-saving, better environmental protection due to less traffic and mainly people's happiness level would be increased.
Nevertheless, no matter how developed the country is, if there is no preserved history, it wouldn't be considered as a great country. In fact, old and historical buildings can be identified as snapshots of history. Therefore, it is the government's responsibility to protect and restore such buildings. For instance, in many cities, such buildings have become very popular tourist attractions making an exponential amount of income to the country's economy. In addition, people should have some iconic building to be proud of their past and which helps to educate children as well. Therefore, preserving old building has an equal significance as building roads and housing in terms of countries development and overall happiness of people.
In conclusion, although road and housing development are important, the government should not stop spending money on restoring old buildings as such building contribute greatly to the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 92, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s, if there is no preserved history, it wouldnt be considered as a great country. In fa...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...pshots of history. Therefore, it is the governments responsibility to protect and restore s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51851851852 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1491760867 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538720538721 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5606880639 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329399796626 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112990949191 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100482364369 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247552419596 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908598586713 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.