With recent astonishing developments of technology, reading materials can now be accessed from various sources, saving people the trouble of going to libraries. Understandably, many people therefore believe that it is not essential to maintain these public institutions anymore. From a personal perspective, though acknowledging several of their drawbacks, I strongly believe public libraries are here to stay despite its decreasing popularity for several reasons explained below.
On the one hand, it should be noticed that the drawbacks of public libraries are worth taking into account. Most prominently, the number of people coming to libraries for books seems to decrease significantly as a result of the proliferation of online sources in recent years. Therefore, the maintenance cost seems to be ludicrous and not commensurate with the little service it renders.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that there still remain some advantages of public libraries, one of which is their reliability. Storing carefully conducted and published documents and research work, libraries tend to have a confirmed and validated authenticity compared to that of online sources. Indeed, information from the Internet is often doubtful, sometimes even deliberately distorted to serve the malicious purpose of misleading people. Another factor is that public libraries nowadays seem to be more than just a source of information. People nowadays tend to consider these places a great work space because its calm atmosphere gives them a perfect sense of concentration that cannot be found anywhere else. With investments to expand libraries into a multipurpose building, covering not only the content sector but also cafeteria and meeting rooms, the prospect of people returning to these institutions is fairly promising despite the rise of computer technology.
In conclusion, although the benefits of online sources are undeniable, it should be remembered that public libraries are still an asset in our society, evidenced by the arguments above. The authority should attach great importance to maintaining and upgrading public libraries in order to promote the benefits of citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 919, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... people returning to these institutions is fairly promising despite the rise of computer technology...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64634146341 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08276184338 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600609756098 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3795276208 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13651958995 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485037818059 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332491711561 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855462163168 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191993336577 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.