A variety of different arguments have been put forward about the issue of whether cultural and artistic value are rewarding to be invested from state supply. While some assume it is unnecessary spending, others believe that both citizens and nation’s culture would benefit if the government were to provide financial support for these respects. I will outline the arguments for and against both views, then state my own opinion in this essay.
On the one hand, many people oppose investing in cultural activities because they realize the gravity of other problems need to be taken action. First of all, the deterioration of transport system in many cites is one of the main causes lead to traffic accidents or even casualties. Using money for constructing new roads and overpasses in lieu of cultural activities, would bring immediate effects and save thousands of lives. In addition, global climate change and related environmental issues are requiring urgent attention, namely pollution and natural resource depletion. National leaders, hence, should join hand with scientists by allocation financial resources to finding preventive measures of environmental problems. For example, the development of renewable energy and environmentally friendly sources of energy. By aforementioned ideas, culture and art are not two imperative factors that should be given top priority.
Advocates of art and culture, on the other hand, they not only play an essential role in people’s lives but also country’s image. Cultural events such as Tet holiday or Christmas and so on have yet been a characteristic identity of a nation which reflect the traditional lifestyle of human beings and the value they convey to human life. Moreover, these occasions are the opportunities for family members gather together, which helps to strengthen the sense of family and community, further enriches people’s lives. Preserving cultural diversity, especially cultural heritage recognized by UNESCO in such a globalised world where so much culture is being lost and abandoned, is of importance. Keeping traditional cultural values is also keeping the roots of mankind which underpin for the development of society. When the reputation of a nation is heightened to international friends by its diversity of unique culture, it would become an ideal destination for both domestic and foreign tourist which help to foster the economy especially the tertiary sector.
In conclusion, t believe that cultural activities are of great significance and require attention and financial support from groverments. However, transport infrastructure and environmental issues also need to be upgraded
- Some people believe that modern high technology is transforming the way we work and is benefit to all of society To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows the average cost of the monthly contract for four di erent mobiles cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 78
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that people have the right to university education and government should make it free no matter what their financial background To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58230958231 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02564464749 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616707616708 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1306892817 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.222222222 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249072096164 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716901352723 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533522846704 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145500132934 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524983485286 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.