It is true that some people argue for the larger amount of governmental funding allocated to freeways than several public means of transportation such as buses. From my personal perspective, I am strongly opposed to this view because the system of public transports have increasingly been in need of improvements for various reasons presented below.
On the one hand, explanations why some people hold such a belief for expending more public funding to freeways are varied. To start with, one of the most noteworthy features is the precaution of commuters with their safety on roads. In fact, a quantity of free roads have been incurring the remarkable degradation in their quality of construction because of a huge number of heavy means of transport travelling on a daily basis such as trucks. Moreover, the increasing number of private vehicles has rendered roads more and more crowded, which could result in accidents due to the lack of free space. Another worth-mentioning feature is the controversial issue about traffic jams. To be more specific, because of the huge number of vehicles travelling on roads, commuters have to confront congestion without any feasible effort to mitigate, especially in rush hours when roads are virtually totally occupied by means of transport.
On the other hand, in the process of improving the quality of free roads, I strongly believe that governments should expend a larger quantity of funding on the upgradation of public transport systems. Firstly, such a reasonable policy could pave the way for an innovative and healthy trend of people. To specify, once the quality of public transports were significantly improved, a proliferating number of commuters would turn to employing these means of transportation instead of their private vehicles, which could remarkably contribute to building environmentally sustainable society by reducing the amount of carbon footprint released on a regular basis. Secondly, actions in allocating more public funds to public transports also benefit the development of a part of society. A lot of those who are not financially secure enough to own a car or a motorbike could reap tremendous benefits from the high quality public with highly affordable prices coupled with adequate services.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that more appropriate quantities of public funds should be invested to the enhancement of freeways, I hold a strong belief that the system of public transports really needs a bigger amount of money to be improved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...er of commuters would turn to employing these means of transportation instead of their priv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31920199501 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04479893502 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54114713217 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.2218803411 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.357142857 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6428571429 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198603675825 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712936365101 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534925767752 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133432021861 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207560626377 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.