In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?
A sheer number of citizens these days prefer living in flats instead of detachable houses. The positive aspects of residency in flats such as strict security, modern amenities and luxurious lifestyle overshadow the negative aspects.
In terms of drawbacks, firstly, one of the major disadvantage is that flats are tad and claustrophobic. They are not spacious hence, disliked by joint families. Secondly, there are no lawns, basements, personal garage and parks in apartments, thereby people cannot enjoy balmy weather or sit back, relax and release their stress. Last but not least, residents are unaware of both their surrounding activities and neighboring individuals.
Despite the demerits, there are merits owing to which residential apartments are preferred. Apartments are architected in a manner that they provide their residents with all modern amenities in a stylish and compact space. Additionally, flats possess heightened security as they have security surveillance cameras installed every few kilometers and properly trained security guards are employed, who keep a strict daily record of all the guest visitors and residents as well. Moreover, strict security levels significantly curtail the chances of burglary, vandalism, abduction and arson in the premises.
Furthermore, residential flats are located in downtown thus providing all sorts of facilities nearby namely educational institutes, hospitals, shopping malls and offices, hence the individuals do not need to travel remote places in order to avail these facilities. In addition, flat themselves are properly equipped with basic necessities including gym, clubs, an uninterrupted supply of electricity, water supply, internet and sewerage system. All these positive aspects make the experience of living in a flat world class and worthy.
In conclusion, even though flats are compact, lack personal garage, lawns and their residents are self-centered but the merits such as luxurious lifestyles, modern amenities and heightened security overshadow the demerits.
- The tendency for human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashions in clothes and other consumers goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion 73
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views 81
- Money is important in most people s lives Although some people think it is more important than others What do you feel are the right uses of money What other factors are important for a good life Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examp 96
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. what are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...t themselves are properly equipped with basic necessities including gym, clubs, an uninterrupted ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8762541806 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99350347843 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628762541806 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0350460528 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0469190317022 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0177442555192 0.084324248473 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0185874521047 0.0667982634062 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0236454466431 0.151304729494 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151680554121 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.