In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?
In my point of view, most of metropolis worldwide are having large big condominiums; and I think that this new kind of accommodation has many advantages, even more than negative points. I think this because population in large cities is growing sharply in last years. So, unfortunately, people don’t have as much space as they usually had before. Then, the constructors are creating solutions for this space issue; building huge apartment condos. With this, they Are trying to find a solution for having less space today for people’s home as lately.
Instead of having a really big garden and a large finished basement, people have chosen condos facilities. Living in large buildings has much positives sides, such as safety, shared swimming pool, shared living areas, or even gymnastic rooms. Despite of what few people might think about, living there my give access to some facilities that you couldn’t be able to afford if you were living in a house.
Otherwise, living in this building has also a dark side. Understandably, you will have to share all common parts of the building with other families. So, you’ll have to be prepared for neighborhood issues, like, for instance, babies crying loud or some people yelling in front of your door. Then, surely, living in a closed community like these condos, is not as easy as living in your own house.
Therefore, despite of the disadvantages that I presented to you below, I really believe that are much more relevant good sides to living in a condo. In fact, the problems are easily fixable comparing with negative aspects.
- Essay topics: government should make more efforts to promote alternative sources of energy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- some people think that universities should provide with konwledge and skills needed in the workplace .Others think taht the true function of a universityshould be to give access to knowladge for its own sake ,regardless of whether the course is usefull to 73
- Film stars and music celebrities may earn a great deal of money and live in luxurious surroundings but many of them lead unhappy lives Do you agree To what extent is this the price they pay for being famous 60
- Some people don’t want to change their behavior to reduce energy production to fight environmental issues. Why do you think they don’t want to change they behavior? What can make they change it? 61
- some people think that universities should provide with konwledge and skills needed in the workplace .Others think taht the true function of a universityshould be to give access to knowladge for its own sake ,regardless of whether the course is usefull to 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...cilities. Living in large buildings has much positives sides, such as safety, shared...
^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat few people might think about, living there my give access to some facilities ...
^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot as easy as living in your own house. Therefore, despite of the disadvantages ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood sides to living in a condo. In fact, the problems are easily fixable comparin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, then, therefore, for instance, i think, in fact, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05660377358 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75061985312 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9572450194 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315305378052 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971195320739 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597322427826 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165807667009 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822580806136 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.