Steep rise in Cancer cases, because of tobacco products, forced all countries to declare smoking as illegal in public spaces. In this context, discrimination shown on smokers is widely justified on various grounds. After thorough understanding the situation, without hesitance, I completely agree with the statement. In this essay, we will discuss the subject matter in details, with relevant examples, before concluding.
Habit of smoking is always viewed as an addictive and dangerous not only for those who smoke but also to people around them. Obviously, carcinogenic agents in cigarette, harmful to health for addictive's is something everyone are aware of. However, very few people know ill effects caused because of smoke breathed by our colleagues and family members. As they are unaware of this involuntary breathing, it is called as passive smoking. Non-smokers but who are associated with people indulged in also can be victims of series of diseases. For instance, children of smoking parents can be described under this category. Recently, according to report published by National Health Sciences , nearly 15% of young individuals who were exposed to nicotine contaminated air were diagnosed with leukemia. Therefore, for overall welfare of society mandating these regulations is must.
On the other hand, implementing these laws will help addictive personalities to abstain from smoking. For instance, because it's inconvenient to leave building everytime they want to light a bud they might reduce frequency. Similarly, the awkwardness created by the seclusion area will also discourage to be far from this addiction. As a result, their lungs and throat will be less infected with cancer causing ingredients. In order to avoid the cigarettes people try to engage in different activities to divert their mind. Anyway, even though it's not complete solution to the problem, this slow shift from addictiveness to creativity is for their own well-being. Infact, these norms yielded better results in Europe nations and drew huge support from anti-tobacco campaigners.
In the wake of above arguments,in a nutshell, we can conlude the topic by welcoming this new legislation for better tomorrow. Hence, once again I reassert my support to the ban on smoking in public places. Certainly, our vote to encourage these rules act as guiding beacon for government to formulate new policies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rt published by National Health Sciences , nearly 15% of young individuals who wer...
^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...gners. In the wake of above arguments,in a nutshell, we can conlude the topic by...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, hence, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45161290323 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92986439935 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2968792984 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.1818181818 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169672469842 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440178513727 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428236566029 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937595604603 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297504108918 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.