One diverse aspect of our world economy is it's juxtaposition of rich and poor nations. On one hand, we have wealthier nations like America who has futuristic era technologies and to other side of spectrum poverty stricken countries like Somalia which are still in medieval ages. This wide gap between developed and undeveloped states cannot be bridged unless we learn to share our resources. In this essay we will outline two perspectives of diametrically opposite angles.
Globalisation demands world to be interconnected heavily and countries cannot prosper in isolated manner. Today's pandemic situation taught us all a lesson to act co-operatively and combat crisis with united strength. For Instance, viral outbreak in African population's is potential threat to middle east countries because of frequent trade routes. Hence, it becomes an obligation of economically developed nations like Saudi and Dubai to control the spread by providing not only short-term help but also act like a check to future exposure. Similarly, aid in all aspects of life like education and food is must as these are major migration reasons.
In contrast, poorer nations responsibility to become self sustained as too much dependence over foreign fund might cause imbalance in relations. This is particularly true, if helping country use it's 'soft power' to politically influence the weak country for their own benefit. China encroaching border poor countries by providing meagre help is classic example of this scenario. Furthermore, feeding billions of people only on aid received from international organisation becomes burden over other nations. Therefore, only practical solution to the problem is developing nations should review their fiscal policies in a manner to stand on their own feet. Ofcourse, occasional help from neighboring states is inevitable and welcomed in situations like natural calamities.
In a nutshell, in order to achieve joint progress we need mutual understanding and should put combined efforts for closing the gap. Apart from humanitarian grounds, there are political and social reasons for supporting deprived nations. Afterall, we all share same earth and as they 'sharing is caring'.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who has futuristic era technologies and to other side of spectrum poverty strick...
^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...gration reasons. In contrast, poorer nations responsibility to become self sustained...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...easons for supporting deprived nations. Afterall, we all share same earth and as they sh...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, apart from, as to, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52366863905 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97546807154 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671597633136 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5762164246 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.722222222 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121966919946 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328570475034 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327064590844 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661720350707 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240965039463 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.