In many countries more money is spent on transport system in the cities In contrast very little is spent in rural areas What are the effect of this and What can be done to solve this problem

Nowadays, urban areas are growing in a fast pace, as a result governments invest a lot of money in the transport network of the cities, while rural areas receive less funds for this purposes. In this essay, I will discuss what kinds of issues are associated with it and probable solutions of them.

Owing the problem of funding in a rural transport sector, lack of funds means lack of road infrastructure, which is apparently leads to decline of growth of a certain area. This is because a good road network is absolutely necessary for any kind of construction and development. In addition, we can observe impassable roads and not enough public transport in the country. Frankly speaking, a road network so poor, it is “not fit to support the rural economy’. As a result, country dwellers feel “left behind” and “of the radar” with absence of public services and attention from the government towards their issues.

However, there are few ways to tackle the problems associated with the limited availability of public transport in areas facing remoteness. First and foremost, authorities should increase the budget for funding of rural transportation system. The second step will be addition of paved roads to rural road network in such way as them are connected to strategic points for survival such as hospitals, schools, shops, churches and make them accessible for the major of countryside. As well as this, a bus fleet of the public transport should be increased and new bus routes should be added. These measures will help country people to improve their quality of life, seeing the development of the area will encourage local habitats to stay in villages, and the economy of the region will be inevitably grow.

In conclusion, I believe that transportation system of rural sector should not be neglected by the government and it should be sufficiently funded as road network is fundamental part of regional economy growth and sustainable development.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (8 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun funds is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...f the cities, while rural areas receive less funds for this purposes. In this essay,...
^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...hile rural areas receive less funds for this purposes. In this essay, I will discuss...
^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
... This is because a good road network is absolutely necessary for any kind of construction and develo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the region will be inevitably grow. In conclusion, I believe that transporta...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, frankly, however, if, second, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17283950617 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95258599542 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552469135802 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7886261732 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.923076923 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168326693252 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657963635316 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397269298436 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113972847685 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383226188598 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.