In many countries, paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common. Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?
The world is leading towards digitalization. The development in computer science has changed the way of payment from cash to cashless. There are multiple mobile applications available in play store by which you can pay for any item just by scanning the payment barcode. I believe there are more advantages than disadvantages of this technology.
Nowadays, the mobile applications become a regular part of life and has many advantages. Firstly, these are secure with personal UPI IDs and asks for the authentication of the user by scanning fingerprint or using personal pin. For example, there is Paytm, Phone-pe and Google-pay apps which are very secured and authenticated. Secondly, these apps are providing few offers to provide benefit to a user in form of cashback or some discount voucher for a particular payment. Lastly, the use of these applications is increased because this has cut down the use of heavy cash, and moreover one can transfer a big amount just in seconds.
There is also a downside of this technology. Using such mobile applications need a good understanding of the technology which is very difficult for someone of old age. If someone loses their mobile phone or if it gets steal, there are chances of misuse of these apps. Even there are many malicious files or viruses which can breach the security of these applications and can share the bank details with some hackers. These applications timely update their versions for security purpose, so it is necessary to use the latest version while paying to avoid any kind of unauthorized transaction.
To conclude, this technology has made the life easy and smooth. However, the proper knowledge of using these mobile applications is necessary to avoid any kind of risk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | thadsha1999 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | minhhh123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | bilal_chaudhry | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | shadow1222 | 73 | view |
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 78
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 73
- You have seen an advertisement from a couple who live in Australia for someone to teach their two children your language for a year Write a letter to the couple In your letter 1 Explain why you think you would be suitable for the job 2 Say what else you c 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this application' or 'these applications'?
Suggestion: this application; these applications
... particular payment. Lastly, the use of these application is increased because this has cut down ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'loses'.
Suggestion: loses
...cult for someone of old age. If someone lose their mobile phone or if it gets steal,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90452997356 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548611111111 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6698768423 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253308032225 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802276223241 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583917452726 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146616086148 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475202087125 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.