In many countries as people are earning more these days they are also spending money buying more and more things Do you think this is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

In many countries, as people are earning more these days they are also spending money, buying more and more things. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over a couple of decades. Presently, it is argued that much money is earned by individuals and they spend a lot of money on buying more things. Here, i would like to account for both positive and negative views with my own perception.

There are manifold benefits of this phenomena. First and foremost, such practice uplift the standard of individual's lifestyle. To justify, much monetary increase the demand and desires which allows them to buy expensive materials such as vehicles, food, house and many more. Apart from it, as it is said that "Dreams do come true", they might complete their dreams by following this trend that keep them satisfied al the time. Thus, they are expected to be lived a healthy lifestyle.

On contrary, it has certain negative developments. To commence with, this trend engages them in unwanted activities such as spend huge money on branded outfits and sometimes they buy that kind of material but in actual they do not need it, they prefer to showoff so that they can show themselves they are rich in the community. In addition to this, due to peer pressure, they become extravagant. Thence, they are likely to be lost the opportunity of learning money management.

From my notion, both aspects have their own significance. Some masses assert that this trend can solve their 99 % of the problems on this planet. However, i still believe that it can be bane for us.

To recapitulate, undeniable, such phenomena can spoil the habits of masses that may destroy their future.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-16 Gourav Munjal 61 view
Essays by user Gourav Munjal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...t of money on buying more things. Here, i would like to account for both positive...
^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tion. There are manifold benefits of this phenomena. First and foremost, such pra...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, apart from, in addition, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00383141762 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70034863627 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.9122131005 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244268030173 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656035047827 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764905596652 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115284192568 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864768409974 0.056905535591 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.