In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree?
Smoking has always been an issue of debate since ages. Many countries are now starting to ban smoking in public places. In this contemplation I will explain why I agree that such a ban is justified.
Firstly, people who smoke are addicted to smoking as they have already made a choice of choosing pleasure over health. However, when smokers use public places for smoking then the people in the vicinity suffer the consequences of passive smoking. For instance, an old man sitting and smoking in train would become a nuisance for an infant and his mom sitting next to him. Also, according to a research the life expectancy of a person is likely to decrease if the person is a chronic smoker. Moreover, smoking in public places sets a wrong example for adolescents who start thinking that it is trend.
On the contrary, others believe that the business of pubs, rooftop bars, and discothèques is often increased as a result of allowing smoking in public. Such business would be negatively affected by such kind of laws. But, I think that choosing business over health is unethical. Furthermore, smoking in public places might trigger certain health emergencies in patients having pre-existing lung conditions. For example patients suffering from lung fibrosis, chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) or asthma might require immediate hospitalization if they are subjected to passive smoking. Therefore, I agree that banning smoking in public places is justified.
In conclusion, I reiterate that smoking harms the consumer as well as the passive smokers in the vicinity. If smoking is not banned in public places then it might trigger health deterioration of patients having some concomitant lung diseases. Thus, I believe that the ban is totally justified.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-06 | ankita.hpgdc | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | syed fasi uddin | 44 | view |
- Some people think that staying in hotels is not a good option to know about a country or its people What do you think about this viewpoint 44
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preferred To wh 78
- When we can see films on phones that what the need of going to the cinemas is Others say that to fully enjoy the films it should be seen in cinemas Give both views and give your opinion 56
- People across the world are more similar than they are different To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In many countries very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as the passive smokers in the vicinity. If smoking is not banned in public places ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15734265734 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82855895426 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9003146056 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7647058824 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5294117647 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299424532901 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106662940135 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103458026389 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198321585388 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727583860029 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.