In many countries there is lot of rubbish because more and more people buy things. What are the causes? What are its effects?
Indubitably, a tremendous increase in volume of garbage has been noticed. Majority of nations are confronting the issue f prolific increase in rubbish as people buy more things. Apparently, modernisation and westernisation are to be blamed for this universal phenomenon. However, it begets harrowing upshot on denizens of country.
Fundamentally, the prominent factors that evidently trigger it can be observed. To begin with, an exponential rise in income of people has substantially contributed to purchase of things frequently. Seemingly, item comes with attractive packaging which is removed and thrown in garbage resulting in significant rise of trash around us. Secondly, in countries like India, population lacks in fulfilling the duty of keeping their surroundings clean. To corroborate, masses are blindly following the disposal culture which consequently affects the amount of rubbish around them. Thirdly, although developed nations has established modern epoch modes to dispose off waste, underdeveloped and developing nations are still insufficient in organising proper waste management techniques. Henceforth, dearth of proper disposal of waste act as a key influencing factor in massive increase of trash.
Nevertheless, it entails myriad detrimental effects on people. Chiefly, unwanted waste around people has a catastrophic effect on environment leading to potential problems of health. Subsequently, heaps of garbage give rise to threatening diseases such as Dengue, Malaria and Food poisoning. Moreover, Is disposal of garbage in rivers leads to dismal consequences. Certainly Yes! If trash is thrown in lakes or rivers it can destruct the aquatic life of animals resultantly sea animals can confront potential problems. In addition to this, cleanliness is an asset which adds beauty to a nation. If things are thrown here and there it will destroy the natural beauty of mother earth. At the outset, countries with the scenario of high volume of garbage cannot reap the benefits of visitors and tourists. Consequently, it can have o negative impact on economy of a nation.
To recapitulate, the world has witnessed numerous changes due to advancement amongst which the trend of significant rise in garbage is one. However, it is an outcome of modern era's lifestyle of people ate distinct stages. Apparently, purchasing power of people and negligence towards duties has lead to menace of increased trash. Nonetheless, it can lead to inherited downside of poor health and environment of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-30 | harsimrankaur26 | 92 | view |
- Some people say that communication between family members is less now as compared to past Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some believe that advances in technology are increasing the gap between rich and poor while others think the opposite is happening Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 61
- Some people say that educational success depends most of the time on having a good teacher Others says attitude of students also matters Discuss and give your opinion 84
- You would like to participate in a work related seminar in another country Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates program accommodation and cost 73
- Now a days young people are admiring media and sports stars even though they do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'eras'' or 'era's'?
Suggestion: eras'; era's
...ne. However, it is an outcome of modern eras lifestyle of people ate distinct stages...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61256544503 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16293638135 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6214610682 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981030066071 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259878188966 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457057083537 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620424253146 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297079138732 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.