Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Management of public finance in the right manner is always a major challenge for governments. While some critics consider spending the country's finance on art a waste, I would contend that art should be considered a worthy initiative because of the country's cultural heritage and creative approach.
Undoubtedly, art inevitably represents the country's cultural heritage, allowing us to understand our history and identity. So, it has led its people to create a strong bond with their roots, knowing their true identity, resulting in citizens being more patriotic about their motherland. A country, for instance, rich in art, is always considered famous and organized because of patriotism. Istanbul in Turkey is a prime example, it is known as the capital of many dynasties, and all the cultures combined in one place made it a truly historical place worldwide and a great tourist attraction. Therefore, arts will let us know who we truly are.
In addition, art induces creativity among its citizen, especially children. Because art allows us to think outside the box, generating a habit of smart thinking, which has led to the creation of famous infrastructure, paintings, novels, and philosophy. For example, Tajmahal, India, is known to the world as one of the earth's masterpieces, not because of how old it is but because of its unique design and creative concept, which made history. So, spending money on art will spread creativity among people.
In conclusion, spending finance on art is not a waste; art represents the country's identity and spreads creativity among people. It is the core responsibility of the government to keep the legacy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-08 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-08 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-08 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | Firl 89 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | Firl 89 | 84 | view |
- Nowadays young people lack an understanding of how to manage their finances after they finish high school Explain why they do not know how to manage money and how this can be changed 78
- Some people believe that technology has made the world a better place while others think it has caused more problems than it has solved Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems 89
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems 84
- Nowadays young people lack an understanding of how to manage their finances after they finish high school Explain why they do not know how to manage money and how this can be changed 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24436090226 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97054576168 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6819474245 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110304497665 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405330641271 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309276256056 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686776313654 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00387150180545 0.056905535591 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.