Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, making comments or even criticism has been a controversial matter which frequently generates a great deal of heated debate, with many supporters believing that high school students should express standpoints on their teachers with a view to improving educational quality, whilst opponents argue that it could be a negative tool for subjectively personal aims. From my perspective, I believe that both view points have their own merits and demerits, this essay would succinctly look into them to provide a plausible conclusion.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why it might not be considered beneficial for learners to have comments or condemnations of educators. Firstly, while students are impulsive and not mature enough to make objective judgments, advocating them to stand a chance for personal thoughts could result in a dearth of respect and discipline. Some students give negative words to their teachers when it comes to a controversial issue. Secondly, this could lead to chaos in the class due to internal disunity and division. An excellent illustration of this is that when the escalation of students’ deliberately critical thinking becomes worse, there have been some misunderstandings between them on dissents.
On the other hand, there is evidence to support the idea that this approach of receiving comments has some undoubted benefits. Firstly, giving feedback to their teachers could help all of them to find out the most suitable methods of learning for a better academic path. This is because the teachers would make adjustments to ensure that their students can comprehend fully the lessons. Moreover, students could have more freedom in expressing their thoughts and feelings, facilitating the ability for debates. Thus, being able to give constructive feedback and exchange opinions with their educators, the students could become more positive and stand a chance to improve self-confidence in daily communications.
For the aforementioned reasons it seems to me that both view points have their own benefits and drawbacks. From my perspective, I believe that the merits outweigh its counterpart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-18 | Nguyen Khanh | 78 | view |
- The line graph and table show the average monthly temperatures and annual hours of sunshine in three major cities 78
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 73
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011 78
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47590361446 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04782368355 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569277108434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9403097246 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.857142857 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251860300513 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775756966425 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629849675844 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149165181396 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720284352469 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.